Luke Pearce

Luke Pearce

Luke is an Associate Lecturer at UCL, working on the Englicious project, and has worked as an English teacher for over 10 years, mainly in post-16 and adult education.

Location South London, UK

Activity

  • Thank you for taking part in the course!

  • Yes, you're right! Verbs of being or 'state verbs' are another category. For example: be, seem, appear etc. For the sake of simplicity, we didn't focus on this category but it could certainly be included in other activities.

  • Sorry about that. I'm sure that the IT team will have this resolved as soon as possible! The materials on Englicious are extra content, but you don't need to access it to complete this course.

  • We offer the same courses either on FutureLearn or as a half-day online session. They cover mostly the same content, but the half-day course is more intensive whereas the FutureLearn course can be covered at your own speed.

  • Yes, that's one we often hear from learners! 'No response' is a response of sorts and hopefully they can still analyse the text and explain why they got so little from it.

  • The activity you've suggested is a great example of teaching grammar in context! The learners first connect with the poem and the topic of aging, but also can put to use grammatical concepts like subordinated clauses and Fronted Adverbials.

  • This raises a very important issue! For anyone reading a text, even if they understand the grammatical content on the page, their wider understanding will depend on knowing the wider context.

  • Using flashback and flash-forward could be a great way to start talking about tense! It's putting the effect first, and then learners could look at the verb to identify how the changes in time are created through tense (e.g. -ed ending verbs in the past). Even if as teachers we are more familiar with literacy concepts, I think that learning about tenses and...

  • Welcome to the course!

  • Good question! We could talk about 'state' or 'stative' verbs which include the verb 'be' and many others such as 'feel'. Verbs of perception are also state verbs which is a broader category. The labels I used were simply the ones that fit best for the activity and the two characters.

  • I am from Sheffield so have had some very similar experiences! One thing to bear in mind is that any dialectal non-standard usages are still grammatical, but not what we want learners to use in formal writing where Standard English is required.

  • Welcome!

  • It takes some getting used to! This way we can integrate grammar as part of our day-to-day English teaching.

  • I'd say in the ESOL classroom, you will probably always need some explicit grammar teaching! As you said, it's about finding the right balance for your learners. When they are out in the 'real world', they will need to rely on their meaning-making skills more than knowing the grammar terms!

  • Hi Yumiko. Are you still having a problem? If so, please contact me: l.a.pearce@ucl.ac.uk

  • Knowledge of grammar can help the learners understand the difference between standard and non-standard form.

  • Welcome!

  • Great to hear!

  • Very similar to the approach we advocate on this course!

  • I will speak to our IT department and take a look at this.

  • Welcome to the course!

  • Great question! This course follows the grammar used by the English National Curriculum - other grammars will see things differently! We would class words like 'my' or 'her' as determiners for exactly the reason you state. However, words like 'mine' or 'hers' can be used on their own and therefore can also be pronouns. We also would not use the term...

  • It's a bit ambiguous when it comes to the passive voice! Yes technically it is a Subject since it comes before the verb, but it is like an Object since it is the 'patient' which is 'acted on'.

  • Great example!

  • Hi Richard. 'Feature-spotting' is when a teacher asks learners to identify features of the text without any reference to meaning i.e. simply finding the nouns or metaphors or whatever it may be. A punitive approach would be focussing on grammar as purely a matter of correctness and admonishing learners based on the language they use.

  • @JeffLau I agree. It's an extra investment of time and effort in the short-term but it has long-term benefits!

  • Wow, that is very surprising to hear! I had a similar experience with pupils in the UK not knowing about World War II which was the background of a literature extract.

  • Learning standard English as a second language makes a lot of sense. However, it's important to bear in mind that in the real world native speakers don't only make use of the standard variety. I know a lot of overseas students who have struggled with socialising and networking in the UK because they were not familiar with non-standard English.

  • Welcome!

  • Asking learners to predict the title of a text is a great way to check understanding.

  • This goes to show that exams with unseen texts can become tests of cultural knowledge. Not necessarily bad things to know about, but it does undermine the purpose of an English/language assessment.

  • Your questions completely sum up the conundrum English learners face! As a teacher, I think the important thing is to know what our learners are expected to produce in the context of their assessments. The example you shared would be considered a mistake in an exam that requires Standard British or American English (for instance), but in other contexts would...

  • It shows how much time writers must spend deciding on the best order for their sentences!

  • Great examples of reader-response questions!

  • Please send me an email to l.a.pearce@ucl.ac.uk and I can help with this

  • Welcome to the course! Does that mean you teach Korean learners who live in Vietnam?

  • Great point. When we see a 'non-standard' grammatical form, it should be an occasion for inquiry, not finger-wagging!

  • That's great to hear! Welcome to the course. Hopefully you can make lots of connections between the two.

  • Lots of great ideas!

  • Hello and welcome to the course!

  • Welcome to the course!

  • Welcome!

  • We have experimented with a forum before but it's hard to maintain especially in the days of social media. If you follow us on X (formerly Twitter), we do have discussions there and would happily share any questions you might have!

  • It's true we can get some meaning from just the sentences, but it would be far more meaningful when read in its proper context.

  • Welcome to the course!

  • I couldn't agree more!

  • That's great to hear!

  • Thanks for taking part!

  • I think this is a great text to use since it has such a great impact on the reader - for better or worse. Adverts like this are expertly designed to manipulate our fears as you said.

  • That's a very creative way to elicit reader response!

  • @ClintonHenderson Thank you for illustrating the point so well! Decontextualised examples can often lead to these kinds of confusions since language naturally exists in a wider context.

  • You must hear many interesting examples of translanguaging!

  • Seeing grammar as a set of choices rather than a list of rules is a big part of our approach!

  • Thank you!

  • I think you'll find this course very useful to build on this approach you have already laid out!

  • Beautifully put! Makes me want to learn an instrument!

  • Studying other languages is a great way to gain a better understanding and appreciation of grammar! I probably would not have become an English teacher if I'd never studied Spanish!

  • I think you have a typo in the first line! :)

  • Good question. This course is designed for mainstream teachers in the UK in which pupils are required to learn about grammar as part of their compulsory primary education. Therefore the activities build on that knowledge. But of course this relies on the learners already having a baseline of grammatical knowledge which would probably be taught through more...

  • For second-language learners, it will always be necessary to do some old-school memorising. Like you say, the end goal should be to connect that knowledge to real, meaningful texts.

  • Thank you!

  • There are many who advocate 'no grammar' approaches to language learning. It's certainly possible, but only if you focus on speech and communication at the expense of writing and deeper analysis.

    The terminology we use is that from the English National Curriculum (2014). Of course, there are many other terms out there, so use whatever is best for your...

  • Hopefully this course will give you some more options!

  • Welcome! That sounds like an adventure!

  • Welcome! I hope you enjoy it!

  • Welcome to the course and Happy New Year!

  • Thank you! That's great to hear!

  • Thank you for taking part!

  • That's a great question! You don't need to use the technical terms like deixis or proximal. Maybe try cutting out words like 'here', 'there', 'me', 'you' and asking pupils to place these in appropriate places around the room. Timelines are also a useful way to work with past, present and future.

  • Great! These are the connections we want our students to start noticing.

  • If you search for 'Englicious' you should find us!

  • Welcome!

  • Welcome to the course!

  • After you submit your assignment, you should be assigned one automatically after you click 'Next' on this page.

  • Welcome!

  • Great to hear! Many teachers avoid using grammar to analyse texts at GCSE level, but it's always useful to have another angle to use in the exam!

  • What is a diamante poem?

  • Greats ideas! Of course, in a real lesson, we could combine the grammar with analysis of other literary and poetic devices.

  • Starting with images is a good idea. Learners could write their own headlines to check their understanding of the genre.

  • @MaríaVerónicaSpuntone This is exactly the kind of approach we will be taking later on!

  • These are great! :)

  • Great definition!

  • A mixture of both approaches is often a good way to go!

  • Great idea to make the writing task about something then learners can relate to. I find pupils love to debate things like DC/Marvel or Xbox/Playstation.

  • I'd agree - stick to whatever terminology is used most consistently in your context. Understanding the grammatical concept is more important than using the 'right' terminology.

    Out of curiosity, does French grammar use terms like 'adverbial' or 'determiner'?

  • That's exactly the issue - a language test becomes a test of general knowledge. For example, the latest SATs tests had complaints because it partly relied on children knowing that Austin is a city and that Texas is a state.

  • That's a very interesting point! Linguists call this L1 interference. We have to balance correcting our learners with accepting that language evolves - especially in the UK with so many regional and international varieties of English being used! Many people speaking English as a second language make these persistent 'errors', but this doesn't usually hamper...

  • The teacher could show the pupils four different pictures and ask which one fits which headline the best. Like the sentences, the how the images are edited and framed also creates bias!

  • What a great way to connect the reader's response to the themes of the advert!

  • Great ideas!

  • Welcome Angélica!

  • This is called textual intervention and it's something we will look at often in the coming weeks! :)

  • A 'proxy definition' is a simplified explanation that stands in for the full, detailed definition. Teachers (and everyone else) use them because it's time-consuming to explain everything in detail and they are easier for pupils to remember. For example, 'adjectives are describing words' is a proxy definition. It's simple and easy to remember, but the big...

  • Welcome to the course!

  • Welcome!

  • This is a great response! It certainly takes the reader on a journey! An advert like this could take advantage of the fact that people often use their phones to check the bus times, which connects to the imperative at the end.

  • I experienced that conflict between TEFL and the UK curriculum. EFL resources often talk about the 9 tenses, whereas I think most grammarians would say there are 3 or even just 2.

  • Welcome!

  • Welcome!